Today Trustee’s attorneys presented oral arguments before the U.S. District Court detailing how the U.S. Bureau of Land Management unlawfully conducted lease sales in the Western Arctic.
“The Trump administration is in such a rush to give away our public lands to the highest bidder that it isn’t taking the time to look at the potential impacts to fish, wildlife, subsistence, or other resources,” said Suzanne Bostrom, the Trustees attorney leading the case. “This leap before you look approach is contrary to law.”
Trustees took the Trump administration to court in February on behalf of five clients.
Trump’s drilling agenda is not above the law
The law requires that the Bureau of Land Management take a close look at the impact of oil and gas activity in the Western Arctic—also called the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska—before selling the rights to development.
In today’s arguments, Trustees argued that the agency never looked at the site-specific impacts or the cumulative impacts of multiple development proposals before issuing leases.
We further argued that BLM failed to retain the ability to say “no” to later development proposals, even if those proposals would disrupt animal migration routes and nesting areas, the availability and access to wild foods, and the sustainability and health of wildlife habitat.
Worst yet, the administration plans to continue using this unlawful process for future lease sales. Not on our watch.
The interconnected Arctic
The Western Arctic is the largest unit of public land in the country. It provides wild foods to Alaska Native people, vital nesting and molting sites for hundreds of thousands of birds, and habitat for a wide range of wildlife.
Yet what we call the Western Arctic is part of an interconnected Arctic region that spans northern Alaska and Canada, and indeed across the globe. Communities across the Arctic regions have suffered the full brunt of a changing climate.
Intense development pressure
In the Western Arctic alone, the Trump administration is rushing to hand over public land as fast as it can, pushing for:
- a rushed environmental review process for the Greater Mooses Tooth-2 oil project, despite the enormous impact on Alaskans who live nearby and depend on that area for their way of life;
- a rushed environmental review process for the Willow project, despite the project’s scope and size; and
- a modification of the Integrated Activity Plan to promote oil and gas development in areas currently protected because of their critical importance to wildlife and people.
Going to court is just one way in which Trustees works within broad coalitions to protect the Arctic.
Clients: The Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Alaska Wilderness League, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club, and The Wilderness Society.
Attorneys: Suzanne Bostrom, Brook Brisson